I think Sid O’Neill sums up some insightful points in this piece entitled “Losing Apple”. Admittedly I’ve been thinking a lot of the same things recently. The technology echosphere regurgitates the same facts over and over and, while I admit I read quite a bit of it, I often feel like I am reading to find support for things I’m already thinking.
Unlike O’Neill, I am truly excited and maybe too optimistic about the latest Apple news. The WWDC announcements seem pretty major to me. Some of it is marketing and it is easy to get caught in the afterglow in the afterlight of such events, but the long term effects of the announcements will be felt for years to come. I suspect, given the amount of copying that goes on in the mobile OS space, the changes will ripple through the entire mobile ecosystem in a major way.
I really am not trying to condemn anyone for having a lot of interest in the above stuff. I am speaking from a place of sympathy and empathy. My main feeling here is just one of confusion. How did I end up so interested in this? And why would anyone be interested in this?
It’s a fair point. After plowing through dozens of very similar articles I ask myself the same question. Despite the over-exposure, my interest stems from a few specific areas.
While it is true that the last couple of weeks have been a deluge of dubious information for most people, for those whose livelihood depends on the things announced in the 2014 WWDC keynote, it has been a pretty extraordinary series of revelations that we will be feeling the effects of for years to come.
One thing Sid and I can agree on – “Rumor is pointless”
Apple will release what Apple releases, when they release it. The speculation is just vapid mouth-flapping.
Now if you’re excuse me, I need to go tweak my news filters to exclude any mention of “iWatch” and “bigger iPhone”.
The Android crowd has been crowing about the addition of custom keyboards and things that are more widget-like than previous iOS versions. These features represent, to me, Apple’s checking things off of a list to shut up Android devotees who continue to hold these minor features over their heads. To have them embedded as a bullet-point on a slide surrounded by more substantive and sweeping changes seems to back up that idea. “You four people who want custom keyboards? OK you got them… moving on…” What is ironic is that the extension of the keyboard may lead to even more innovation within apps which can now use them to extend their specific functionality. Also, thanks to Apple’s newest inter-app communication protocols, this is all happenening with far more security that Android’s implementation as well, which shouldn’t go unnoticed given the fact that 97% of malware exists on the Android platform (according to a Forbes 2014 report). ↩
The new version of Ole Zorn’s Editorial is out. It is a Universal build so if you bought the excellent iPad version, you get the new iPhone version for free.
It is magical. Zorn is a wizard. There is no other possibility.
Viticci has written another comprehensive and quintessential review of the apps and their features and it is well worth checking out if you are on the fence. Pour a big cup of coffee before starting it. It is epic-length and has videos.
Go buy Editorial now. It has finally unseated Nebulous Notes as my go-to text editor on all devices running iOS and it is worth far more than the paltry $6.99USD price tag. Finding the app may be a challenge however since searching for “Editorial” on the App Store yields tons of useless garbage not related to editorials or text editing. I found the app by searching for “Pythonista”, Zorn’s other tour-de-force, and then looking under the heading “Other apps by this developer”. Nice job, App Store. Real nice.
Here’s another great talk by Maciej Ceglowski. This time he talks about some topics near and dear to my heart:
He writes with humor and candor and I really love his take on some of the topics which he’s in a great position to give an opinion on. I hate throwing up my hands at the powerlessness of it all, so here are some steps that I’ve taken and maybe you should think about taking too.
From Maciej’s talk:
I’ll use Facebook as my example. To make the argument stronger, let’s assume that everyone currently at Facebook is committed to user privacy and doing their utmost to protect the data they’ve collected.
What happens if Facebook goes out of business, like so many of the social networks that came before it? Or if Facebook gets acquired by a credit agency? How about if it gets acquired by Rupert Murdoch, or taken private by a hedge fund?
What happens to all that data?
Comforting thought, no? I wish I had given that idea more weight before I uploaded all of my pictures to Everpix. I’m sure they deleted all of the photos I uploaded to their site…right?
Admittedly, I cheat on this one. I still read Twitter although I read it much less than I used to. I also have a secret and anonymous (ha!) Instagram account where I follow things I like. (disturbing fun fact: it is all tattoos, tattoo artists and knives. Take that,
Over at The Candler Blog, Jonathan Poritsky writes about an Alfred workflow he wrote that searches DuckDuckGo’s new beta DuckDuckGo Next. DDGN is a great version of my favorite search site with a cleaner results page that combines the best search alternative to Google in existence with a gorgeous design sense. The workflow is great.
Poritsky’s workflow uses Google Suggest to suggest possibilities as you type and then the result is sent quickly to DuckDuckGo. The results are displayed in your default browser.
If you’re a DuckDuckGo fan and an Alfred user, go snag the workflow on the Candler Blog.